… despre Iran şi SUA:
“The widely propagated notion of a suicidal Iran detonating its very first nuclear weapon against Israel is more the product of paranoia or demagogy than of serious strategic calculus. It cannot be the basis for US policy, and it should not be for Israel’s, either,”
“Alas, such a heavy-handed ‘sticks’ and ‘carrots’ policy may work with donkeys but not with serious countries. The United States would have a better chance of success if the White House abandoned its threats of military action and its calls for regime change,”
“Consider countries that could have quickly become nuclear weapon states had they been treated similarly. Brazil, Argentina and South Africa had nuclear weapons programs but gave them up, each for different reasons. Had the United States threatened to change their regimes if they would not, probably none would have complied”
Mai multe găsiţi aici. Ceea ce ştie şi Brzezinski şi ştim şi noi e că acolo e prea puţin vorba despre programul nuclear. Şi e mult mai degrabă vorba despre altceva. Asta nu înseamnă ca Brzezinksi e un naiv sau că vede ci verzi pe pereţi. El înţelege foarte bine codul. Şi îşi formulează poziţia în acelaşi cod. Restul e saramură.